Pastlasby Oleh Voronko

State · 1440 – 1634

Nogai Horde

A state of 1440 – 1634 — 194 years in South Asia. It followed Great Horde. Its line of rulers holds 1 person. Its own article says it was partitioned by following groups Budjak from the.

For the full story, the article on Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0); this page holds what the record says of the state.

Stood
194 years
1440 – 1634
Rulers
1
the bey
Most ground
702,600 km²
in 1512
Map: Nogai Horde in 1512, its borders in gold among its neighbours
Nogai Horde in 1512, when it held the most ground the borders dataset draws for it: 702,600 km². Its neighbours wear their tints, as on the atlas's own map. Borders from Cliopatria (CC BY 4.0), coast and rivers from Natural Earth, cities from Reba, Reitsma & Seto 2016 (CC BY 4.0), each city under the name it bore that year.
Nogai Horde in 1512, at its largest

1512 · at its largest · 702,600 km²

Nogai Horde in 1588, last mapped

1588 · last mapped · 108,200 km²

The rise and the fall in one frame: the same ground at the years the borders dataset first maps it, maps it largest, and last maps it.

Where it sits in time

3000 BCE2000 BCE1000 BCE110002000Great Horde: 1433 – 1502Nogai Horde: 1440 – 1634

Five thousand years, 3000 BCE to 2026; the state in gold, what it replaced or followed and what replaced or followed it in grey.

Before and after

The states the record files it as replacing or following, and those that replaced or followed it - Wikidata's own statements, each read from this state's side.

Before it

How it ended, as its article says

Partitioned by following groups Budjak from the. Read from the article's section “lead” by its grammar; the claim is only that the article says so.

They were divided into the following groups: Budjak (from the Danube to the Dniester), Yedisan (from the Dniester to the Bug), Jamboyluk (Bug to Crimea), Yedickul (north of Crimea) and Kuban.

One sentence of the English Wikipedia article, CC BY-SA 4.0.

Rulers

The line of bey.

RulerReignLengthHow it ended · sourceTo the ruler before

1 rulers, 0 with terms dated as terms. A blank in the last column means no kin on record, which is coverage, never “unrelated”.

Ground held, by year

km² inside its borders as the borders dataset draws them, measured on an equal-area grid; a step series, held between the years the dataset maps.

1450150015501600

702,300 km² in 1450, 108,200 km² in 1634; at its largest 702,600 km² in 1520. Cliopatria, CC BY 4.0.

Among all states

Each measure against the states that carry it, never against all of them: a bar is the share of those states below this one.

  • How long it stood194 years

    stood longer than 61% of 3,187 states with a recorded end or still standing.

  • The most ground it held702,600 km²

    held more ground at its peak than 79% of 1,465 states with a border in Cliopatria.

  • Wars recorded per centurynone

    had more wars on record per century than 44% of 3,187 states, counting the wars the atlas hosts under each.

  • Rulers on record1

    has more rulers on record than 13% of 1,968 states with a line of rulers.

What led to it, and what came of it

The investigation's own picture: 3 causes the record names and 0 results, the strongest six of each at their own years, joined to the state by the kind of claim - a recorded statement solid, the article's sentence dashed, a theory dash-dot.

Great Horde · Linked · 1433 – 1502Great HordeTokhtamysh · In the article · 1342 · “Due to his role in defeating and killing Tokhtamysh he was granted a great measure of independence to the Nogai Horde and giving him control over much of the …”TokhtamyshGolden Horde · In the article · 1243 · “Due to the decentralised nature of the Golden Horde, the Nogais were relatively independent of their overlords in Sarai and thus didn't oppose the Crimeans in…”Golden HordeNogai Horde · 1440 – 1634Nogai Horde1300140015001600
in the articlelinked

Open the investigation: every row with its evidence, the conditions at the time, the theories condition by condition, and the succession analysed.

Theories that apply to its ending

Of 3 theories of why states fall, 1 has every condition present at this ending; each is applied by its own logic, condition by condition, and whether its authors named this case is a footnote.

  • Challenge, failed response and dissolution

    Toynbee 1934 · Toynbee & Somervell 1946

    Applies by its own logic: 2 of its 2 conditions held here (it needs all of them), and this is the kind of outcome it predicts — the state's ending.

    • territory shrank by 25% over the 100 y ending 25 y before — territory -85
    • unrest, adverse regime change or atrocity within 100 y in the state, or a war the state is fighting, still under way, or a war the state fought, ended within 50 y, or battle within 50 y in the state — warEnded

Open in the atlas

Wikidata Q631210 (CC0) · borders Cliopatria, CC BY 4.0 · coast and rivers Natural Earth · one sentence of the English Wikipedia article, CC BY-SA 4.0 · data built 2026-10-06 · Pastlas v2.9.1, by Oleh Voronko. The published atlas and its data are for non-commercial use.