Peru–Bolivian Confederation

Where it sits in time

Five thousand years, 3000 BCE to 2026; the state in gold.

How it ended, as its article says

Dissolved, 1839-01-20. Read from the article's section “History - Dissolution” by its grammar; the claim is only that the article says so.

He was defeated in the Battle of Yungay on 20 January 1839, and thus, the Confederation was dissolved, with Gamarra announcing its dissolution on 25 August.

One sentence of the English Wikipedia article, CC BY-SA 4.0.

Rulers

The line of Supreme Protector of the Peru–Bolivian Confederation.

2 rulers, 2 with terms dated as terms, covering 1836 – 1839. Only 3 years of the line are dated - too short for a median. 1 of 1 handovers irregular - a killing, a deposition, a rival claimant, a rising or a coup beside it. The violent-handover count is withheld: power changed hands so often that any rising falls beside one (exposure 1.00, limit 0.6). A blank in the last column means no kin on record, which is coverage, never “unrelated”.

Ground held, by year

km² inside its borders as the borders dataset draws them, measured on an equal-area grid; a step series, held between the years the dataset maps.

3.21 million km² in 1836, 3.21 million km² in 1839. Cliopatria, CC BY 4.0.

Flags and arms, in order

Each symbol with the years its own statement gives; the timeline flies the one of the year on screen.

Among all states

Each measure against the states that carry it, never against all of them: a bar is the share of those states below this one.

• How long it stood3 years

  stood longer than 10% of 3,187 states with a recorded end or still standing.

• The most ground it held3,208,500 km²

  held more ground at its peak than 95% of 1,465 states with a border in Cliopatria.

• Wars recorded per centurynone

  had more wars on record per century than 44% of 3,187 states, counting the wars the atlas hosts under each.

• Rulers on record2

  has more rulers on record than 34% of 1,968 states with a line of rulers.

Theories that apply to its ending

Of 3 theories of why states fall, 1 has every condition present at this ending; each is applied by its own logic, condition by condition, and whether its authors named this case is a footnote.

• Demographic-structural breakdown

  Goldstone 1991 · Turchin & Nefedov 2009

  Applies by its own logic: 2 of its 3 conditions held here (it needs 2), and this is the kind of outcome it predicts — unrest, adverse regime change or the state's ending.

  • overlapping reigns — rival claimants — within 20 y, or 3 or more changes of ruler within 20 y, or 2 or more reigns of two years or less within 20 y, or a monarch deposed or killed within 20 y — rivalClaimants -2
  • a war the state is fighting, still under way, or a war the state fought, ended within 10 y — warOngoing